1994-04-29                     House Journal                      Page 3885
SB 212                                                                       
Representative Ulmer brought up reconsideration of the vote on HCS             
CSSB 212(L&C) am H (page 3843).                                                
                                                                               
                                                                               
The following was again before the House in third reading:                     
                                                                               

1994-04-29                     House Journal                      Page 3886
SB 212                                                                       
HOUSE  CS  FOR  CS  FOR  SENATE  BILL  NO.                                    
212(L&C) am H                                                                  
"An Act relating to the giving of procurement notices;                        
changing the content of the required procurement reports to                    
the legislature by the commissioner of administration; relating                
to publications produced by state agencies; establishing an                    
innovative construction procurement methods pilot program;                     
and establishing legislative findings, a legislative purpose, and              
legislative intent for state procurement; and providing for an                 
effective date."                                                               
                                                                               
Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS                
CSSB 212(L&C) am H be returned to second reading for the specific              
purpose of considering Amendment No. 5.                                        
                                                                               
Representative Phillips objected.                                              
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall HCS CSSB 212(L&C) am H be returned                 
to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment            
No. 5?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                         
                                                                               
                                                                               
HCS CSSB 212(L&C) am H--RECONSIDERATION                                        
Third Reading                                                                  
Return to Second for Amendment No. 5                                           
                                                                               
YEAS:  15   NAYS:  22   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  1                             
                                                                               
Yeas:  Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein,           
Grussendorf, Hudson, Mackie, Menard, Nordlund, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis           
                                                                               
Nays:  Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, James, Kott,             
Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips,             
Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams                           
                                                                               
Excused:  Hoffman, Navarre                                                     
                                                                               
Absent:  Nicholia                                                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
And so, the motion failed.                                                     
                                                                               

1994-04-29                     House Journal                      Page 3887
SB 212                                                                       
The question to be reconsidered:  "Shall HCS CSSB 212(L&C) am H                
pass the House?"  The roll was taken with the following result:                
                                                                               
                                                                               
HCS CSSB 212(L&C) am H--RECONSIDERATION                                        
Third Reading                                                                  
Final Passage                                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  34   NAYS:  3   EXCUSED:  2   ABSENT:  1                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Carney, Davidson, B.Davis, G.Davis,               
Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hudson, James, Kott,          
Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Nordlund,              
Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey,        
Vezey, Williams, Willis                                                        
                                                                               
                                                                               
Nays:  Brown, Davies, Ulmer                                                    
                                                                               
                                                                               
Excused:  Hoffman, Navarre                                                     
                                                                               
Absent:  Nicholia                                                              
                                                                               
Mackie changed from "Nay" to "Yea".                                            
                                                                               
                                                                               
And so, HCS CSSB 212(L&C) am H passed the House.                               
                                                                               
Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that the             
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the        
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.           
                                                                               
HCS CSSB 212(L&C) am H was referred to the Chief Clerk for                     
engrossment.